Connect with:
Friday / November 22. 2024
HomeAgroPolicyActs & Schemes – CentrePMFAI oppose ban of Tricyclazole and Buprofezin by Agriculture & Farmers Welfare Ministry  

PMFAI oppose ban of Tricyclazole and Buprofezin by Agriculture & Farmers Welfare Ministry  

bioenergy-devco-buys-bts-biogas
source- public domain(tradeindia.com)

By banning the farmers will be deprived of a good & affordable molecules which is used for control of pests damaging the crops and having a long history of safe use. 

 

 

 Pesticides Manufacturers & Formulators Association of India (PMFAI)  a National Association representing Agrochemical/Pesticide Industry with more than 200 large, medium and small-scale companies as its members from all over India has opposed ban of Tricyclazole and Buprofezin by Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare. 

PMFAI has referred to the Draft Gazette Notification S.O.531 (E), dated 31st January 2020 issued by Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, as per which Inter Ministerial Committee (IMC) proposed ban of two pesticides viz. Tricyclazole and Buprofezin. PMFAI has stated that “We oppose the said ban and put forth some concerns and facts & figures for your ready reference and knowledge. By banning the farmers will be deprived of a good & affordable molecules which is used for control of pests damaging the crops and having a long history of safe use.” 

PMFAI has stated its suggestions about ban on Tricyclazole and Buprofezin 

To have an open house meeting with industry experts, manufacturers, associations along with APEDA, FSSAI and CIB & RC in presence of JS PPA about these products. 

All stakeholders, including government, Industry experts, scientist and commodity groups, must work together to ensure practical decisions is reached and not at the haste of EU.

 Companies supplying these molecules can help farmer or sensitize them with help of Krishi Kendra or Extension officers, Rice growers Association, APEDA and industry personnels to cautiously use the product on rice to avoid excessive use and have controlled MRL suggested by EU. 

The export to EU is hardly 3% -5% whether it is worth bowing to them when the molecules are also used in other crops. 

Restrict use of these molecules in Rice exported to EU and allow its use in India, as no evidence of causing harm to human health /danger to environment animal is reported in India. 

The solution to this problem – can be to have different basmati field pockets and spray some parts of it with tricyclazole to be exported to US exports and parts with isoprothiolane to be exported to EU. But Isoprothiolane will not be afforded by farmers owing to its cost. 

Lastly do India carry out same residue analysis for products coming from EU? 

–  We strongly feel that this is a kind of trade barrier on India as we know   MRLs are arrived at scientifically,whether a country sets an MRL and these can be used for  Protecting the domestic industry . There must be a practice of   Harmonized MRLs which favor trade. India is yet to create a level playing field -the 1995 WTO-SPS agreement for pesticide residue analysis. 

The ban should be assessed and supported by the Indian standards certified by government statutory authority rather than following EU standards.

Share

No comments

leave a comment